ArticleScientific data2026
Exploring curiosity, interest, and surprise: normative ratings of a magic trick video dataset in Italy.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Magic and cognition: a scoping review of empirical evidence on cognitive and neural processes.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epistemic emotions, including curiosity, interest, and surprise, play a crucial role in learning and cognitive processes by bridging motivation and knowledge acquisition. The Magic Curiosity Arousing Tricks (MagicCATs) dataset, comprising 166 magic trick video clips, provides a standardized tool for studying these emotions in experimental settings. This study provides normative ratings for the dataset within an Italian context, based on a sample of 654 participants aged 18-86. Participants evaluated the videos based on clarity, curiosity, interest, surprise, and confidence in solving the trick, using both binary and Likert scales. Rigorous data screening ensured integrity, enhancing the reliability of the findings. The dataset's ecological validity, dynamic stimuli, and capacity to elicit multiple epistemic emotions offer advantages over traditional methods. By contextualizing MagicCATs within an Italian framework, this study advances the investigation of epistemic emotions by supporting their simultaneous assessment across a broad adult age range. Applications include experimental psychology, neuroscience, and education, with potential implications for mental health and age-related cognitive research. Data and resources are available for replication and further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.