ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Patient-Reported Outcomes to Inform Tolerability Characterization in Cancer Trials: A Critical Perspective on Unresolved Methodological Issues.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes assessing treatment toxicity and its impact, and aspects of quality of life, have become increasingly important components of oncology drug development including early phase dose optimization studies. Despite insights from these data, there are limitations on drawing inferences about whether a treatment is tolerable or intolerable, which requires understanding individual risk-benefit assessments that vary between patients, cancer types, and stages of disease. This commentary examines unresolved methodological issues requiring more research rigor and attention: the development of tolerability thresholds based upon toxicity severity data; the direct measurement of tolerability through specific patient self-report measures; and overcoming the challenge of baseline value assessment in important measures such as single item side-effect bother assessments. We call for further research to resolve these challenges and drive more robust inference-making from patient-reported outcomes data collected in cancer clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.