ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2026
Performance of Nonlinear Energy Difference Ratio and Voice Type Component Profile Across Phoneme, Relative Sound Pressure Level, and Environment.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Minimal Perturbation-Based Segment Selection in Connected Speech Differentiates Healthy and Pathological Voice.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNonlinear energy difference ratio (NEDR) and voice type component profile (VTCP) are reliable acoustic metrics for voice classification; however, their performance under varying vocal intensities, speech sounds, and recording environments has not been thoroughly established. This study examined the effectiveness of these measures under real-world variability with different phonemes, sound intensities, and environments to help determine their clinical diagnostic potential.
methodsThirty-one normophonic adults produced sustained vowels (/a/, /i/, /u/) and fricatives (/s/, /z/) at five nominal sound pressure levels from very soft (L1), soft (L2), baseline (L3), loud (L4), and very loud (L5). The vowel /a/ was also recorded in sound-attenuated and noise-masked environments to elucidate the environmental effects on reliability. Trimmed 0.75-second samples were analyzed in MATLAB to compute NEDR and VTCP values. Repeated-measures analysis of variances tested the effects of intensity, sound type, and environment for NEDR and VTCP.
resultsNEDR remained stable across vowels and voiced fricatives, with deviations limited to very soft phonation (L1) and the voiceless fricative /s/. VTCP was more sensitive to changes, particularly at low intensities and in noisy environments, with voice types 3 and 4 frequently misclassifying healthy phonations as disordered. Across environments, NEDR showed greater robustness than VTCP.
conclusionNEDR demonstrates relative stability across vocal intensity, phoneme type, and recording environment, supporting its potential clinical utility, including in telepractice and nonsoundproof settings. Its susceptibility to very low intensities and voiceless fricatives highlights the need for cautious interpretation and further validation in disordered populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.