Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41775526›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026

Spring ephemeral Erythronium umbilicatum may not be vulnerable to phenological mismatch with overstory trees.

Melina Schopler, Anita Simha, Rebecca M Dalton, Emma M Wilson, Emmeline Redick, Elsa Youngsteadt, William K Petry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melina SchoplerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, 100 Derieux Pl, Raleigh, 27607, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8088-5763
Anita SimhaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Life Sciences Bldg, Baton Rouge, 70808, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8770-3029
Rebecca M DaltonDuke University Program in Ecology, Duke University, 2127 Campus Drive, Durham, 27708 USA, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-0615
Emma M WilsonDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, 2800 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, 27607, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-7591-1781
Emmeline RedickDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, 100 Derieux Pl, Raleigh, 27607, NC, USA.
Elsa YoungsteadtDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, 100 Brooks Ave, Raleigh, 27607, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2032-9674
William K PetryDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, 100 Derieux Pl, Raleigh, 27607, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5230-5987

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 7004646National Institute of Food and Agriculture 7005517National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-2137100Tom and Bruce Shinn Fund of the North Carolina Native Plant Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseThe defining life history strategy of spring ephemeral wildflowers is their avoidance of shading by trees during the brief, high-light period before canopy leaf out. Studies suggest that spring ephemerals will experience increased light competition because canopy leaf out is more sensitive to warming than is the phenology of spring ephemerals. However, it remains unclear how longer durations of shade will alter the population dynamics of spring ephemerals and whether all populations are at risk.

methodsWe experimentally shaded Erythronium umbilicatum for one to six additional weeks before canopy leaf out to test for immediate and lagged effects of early shading on the timing of senescence and the probability of survival and flowering. To predict the potential for earlier shading, we combined long-term time series of spring air temperature, remotely sensed tree leaf out, and E. umbilicatum flowering phenology in North Carolina, United States.

resultsEarly shading did not alter E. umbilicatum until the following year, when more-shaded plants senesced later. Year-to-year survival did not change, and the probability of flowering was reduced only when plants experienced extremely early shading. Moreover, E. umbilicatum phenology was more sensitive than tree leaf out to warming temperatures. We project that, under climate warming, E. umbilicatum is unlikely to experience shortened periods of high light.

conclusionsOur findings show that a plant species' defining life history strategy does not necessarily predict their sensitivity to phenological mismatches. This incongruity complicates, but also underscores the importance of identifying the most vulnerable species and directing our research efforts accordingly.

Indexed as

LiliaceaeTreesFlowersLightNorth CarolinaPlant LeavesSeasonsTemperaturecanopy leaf outclimate changeErythroniumhistorical datalight competitionLiliaceaephenologyshade experimenttemperate forest understorytemperature sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID41775526
PMCPMC13003714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.