Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41775479›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Feasibility of the ICF CoreSets for Autism Strengths and Needs Assessment in NHS diagnostic services in England: protocol for a randomised pilot trial.

Marianne Day, Kelly Scargill, Daniel Poole, Ian Kellar, Tracey Anne Young, Sven Bölte, Sally Clarke, Keri-Michèle Lodge, Andrea Woods, M Freeth

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marianne DaySchool of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK marianne.r.day@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-3124
Kelly ScargillSchool of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Daniel PooleSchool of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ian KellarSchool of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-5216
Tracey Anne YoungSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sven BölteKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sally ClarkeSheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Keri-Michèle LodgeLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
Andrea WoodsCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn, UK.
M FreethSchool of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are approximately 700 000 autistic people in the UK, and autism is increasingly being diagnosed in adulthood. Diagnosis on its own does not provide adequate information to plan post-diagnostic support for autistic people, and clinicians often plan support without the use of validated standardised tools which may exacerbate inequities in care. This study will evaluate a novel strengths and needs assessment, based on the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health CoreSet for Autism, for use in adult diagnostic services immediately on receipt of an autism diagnosis. Potential issues, including the length of the assessment, timing of delivery and selection bias, will be explored as part of the trial process evaluation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-arm, multisite, randomised pilot trial design will be used to evaluate the ICF CoreSets for Autism Strengths and Needs Assessment in three diagnostic services in England. A total of 72 newly diagnosed autistic adults will be recruited across the three sites over a 6-month period and randomised into an assessment group (strengths and needs assessment plus standard care) and a treatment as usual group (standard care only). The assessment group will receive a summary report of their strengths and needs on completion of the assessment. Both groups will complete measures of mental health and quality of life at baseline and 3 months follow-up (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaire-7, Recovering Quality of Life questionnaire-10, EuroQoL-5D). Acceptability and feasibility will be measured for the strengths and needs assessment and for trial procedures using standardised measures, progression criteria and qualitative data from clinician focus groups and interviews with a subsample of autistic participants. The study design and procedures are being co-produced with an autistic advisor/patient and public involvement lead and with a steering group of autistic adults. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was reviewed by the East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee and was given Health Research Authority approval on 18 March 2025 (REC reference:25/EM/0041). The results will be disseminated via reports to the funder (NIHR), a peer-reviewed journal paper and academic conferences. We will email a summary report of findings to study participants and will invite participants to an information dissemination event at the end of the study. Links to reports and a lay summary will be provided on the research group's website: https://sharl.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/home TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10283350.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthNeeds AssessmentAdultEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState MedicineFeasibility StudiesPatient Care ManagementPatient-Centered CareQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID41775479
PMCPMC12958878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.