ArticleBMJ open2026
Performance validation of an artificial intelligence-assisted chest radiograph algorithm for incidental pulmonary nodule detection in Malaysian healthcare facilities: a multicentre cross-sectional study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIncidental pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are commonly encountered on chest radiographs (CXRs) performed for routine clinical indications and may represent early manifestations of significant pulmonary pathology, including lung cancer. While low-dose CT screening has mortality benefits in selected high-risk populations, its implementation remains limited in many healthcare settings. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted CXR interpretation has the potential to enhance pulmonary nodule detection. However, evidence from Malaysian clinical practice is scarce. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted CXR interpretation for detecting IPNs across healthcare facilities in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective, multicentre study will include 2452 CXRs from patients aged ≥35 years over a 6-month period across four Klang Valley healthcare facilities. Each CXR will be independently interpreted by an experienced radiologist (>5 years of experience) and analysed separately using an AI system (qXR-LNMS). An independent thoracic radiologist will determine the final classification for analysis if there is IPN detection discordance. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy) will be calculated using a 2×2 classification matrix. Agreement between AI-assisted interpretation and radiologist reports will be assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic. The prevalence of IPNs detected by AI-assisted interpretation and radiologist reporting will be compared using a two-proportion z-test. AI discriminative performance will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve estimation. Statistical analyses will be conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences V.29, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Research Ethics Committee and the Ministry of Health Malaysia Medical Research and Ethics Committee. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and engagement with relevant stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.