Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41775431›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026

Effects of oncolytic immunotherapy with RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) on immune cells mediate responsiveness to anti-PD-1 via STING-mediated interferon signaling.

Victoria Roulstone, Joan Kyula, Elizabeth Appleton, Praveen K Bommareddy, Anton Patrikeev, Sylwia Jones, Linta Kuncheria, Charleen Ml Chan Wah Hak, Shane Foo, Holly Baldock and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Victoria Roulstone *The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK victoria.roulstone@icr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4141-8123
Joan Kyula *The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Elizabeth Appleton *The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Praveen K BommareddyReplimune Inc, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA.
Anton PatrikeevThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0638-8390
Sylwia JonesReplimune Inc, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA.
Linta KuncheriaReplimune Inc, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA.
Charleen Ml Chan Wah HakThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-5699
Shane FooThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Holly BaldockThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Amarin WongariyapakThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Isla LeslieThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Robert PickeringThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3332-9868
Christian ZierhutThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3501-603X
Henry G SmithThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Nitya MohanThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Carmen MuranoThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Lisa C HubbardThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1540-4445
Isaac DeanThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4750-5335
Emmanuel Christian PatinThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-5733
Jim GkantalisThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0693-2011
David MansfieldThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Malin PedersenThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1887-733X
Martin McLaughlinThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-7133
Maria GoicoecheaThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Scott LayzellThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Jonathan MannionThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6054-3451
Winnie FernandoThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Pascal MeierThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Richard VileMolecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Alan MelcherThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2042-3380
Robert S CoffinReplimune Inc, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA.
Kevin J HarringtonThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6014-348X

Funding

Re-purposing Oncolytic Virotherapy to Re-invigorate CAR T Cell Therapy for Solid Tumors.R01CA269384 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Richard G. Vile · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntitumor immune responses induced by oncolytic immunotherapy (OI) are often followed by upregulation of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). As such, the combination of OI with blockade of the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 axis has demonstrated therapeutic activity in preclinical and clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to understand further the immune-mediated mechanism of interaction between oncolytic viruses and anti-PD-1 therapy.

methodsTumor cells and immune cells (splenocytes) were cultured separately, or in co-culture with vusolimogene oderparepvec, an oncolytic herpes simplex virus expressing the fusogenic gibbon-ape leukemia virus-fusogenic membrane glycoprotein protein (GALV) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), also known as RP1. Viral replication, interferon (IFN) responses and PD-L1 expression were analyzed using wild-type, IFNAR1, TNFAR1 and STING knockout splenocytes. In vivo studies evaluated immune cell infiltrates into the tumor following RP1 administration with anti-PD-1 therapy.

resultsRP1 replication was evident in tumor cells but not splenocytes. This was also accompanied by upregulated IFN expression in cultured splenocytes that was absent in cultured tumor cells. However, when these cell types were co-cultured, splenocytes mediated an interferon response to RP1 via STING that was transmitted to tumor cells in a non-touch-dependent manner. Tumor cells responded to these input signals via upregulation of cell surface major histocompatibility complex-I and PD-L1 through tumor intrinsic JAK-STAT signaling. In vivo, an IFN signature was observed following intratumoral injection of RP1, both in injected and non-injected tumors, which was further increased when combined with anti-PD-1 therapy. Marked upregulation of PD-L1 was observed in tumors injected with RP1 accompanied by the recruitment of CD11b+Ly6G+neutrophils into the tumor microenvironment, which stained positive for PD-L1.

conclusionOverall, the data demonstrate that RP1 remodels the tumor microenvironment through a combination of direct and indirect effects on both tumor and immune cells, resulting in an overall more inflamed phenotype.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyInterferonsMembrane ProteinsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAnimalsCell Line, TumorcGAS-STING Signaling PathwayFemaleHumansMiceSignal TransductionSTING ProteinImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsInterferonsMembrane ProteinsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSting1 protein, mouseSTING ProteinCombination therapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorJAK-STATNeutrophilVirology

Identifiers

PMID41775431
PMCPMC12959060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.