ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026
Application of a Natural Language Processing Framework for Data Extraction From Pathology Reports Across Multiple Cancer Types.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPathological reports provide comprehensive insights into the clinical and pathological features of different cancer types. However, extraction of this semi-structured data for research is challenging. To better utilize pathology reports in cancer studies, we developed an efficient natural language processing (NLP) system to automate the extraction of items from pathology reports, facilitating streamlined storage, retrieval, and analysis of clinical data in a centralized database.
methodsTo determine the optimal model for our study, we conducted a comparative analysis of various deep learning architectures, including long short-term memory, convolutional neural network, and transformer-based models such as bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), BioBERT, and ClinicalBERT. The proficiency of the ClinicalBERT model in medical terminology and context significantly enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of data extraction from these reports.
resultsAmong the aforementioned models, ClinicalBERT exhibited the best performance and was selected as the base model. The ClinicalBERT model demonstrated an exceptional performance in accurately classifying variables across multiple cancer types. Regarding stomach cancer, F1 scores (F1 = 1.0) were achieved for variables such as angiolymphatic invasion, and operation name (F1 = 1.0); however, a lower performance was observed for distant metastasis (F1 = 0.3889). Regarding liver cancer, high performance was consistently observed for most variables, with F1 scores above 0.99. Regarding colorectal cancer, F1 scores were achieved for variables such as Dworak's grade, lymph node, operation name, and total mesorectal excision (F1 = 1.0), while slightly lower but acceptable performance was noted for surgical margin (F1 = 0.9259). Regarding breast cancer, F1 scores were achieved for several variables including nipple margin, organ, and superficial margin (F1 = 1.0), while strong performances were noted for lateral and medial margins (F1 > 0.94).
conclusionThis study underscores the efficacy of NLP systems, specifically the ClinicalBERT model, in automating the extraction of important clinical data from pathology reports across various cancer types. This approach can not only simplify the process but also enhance the accuracy of the extracted information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.