Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41775249›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Using Quadratic Programming to Reconstruct Data From Published Survival and Competing Risks Analyses.

Andrew C Titman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew C TitmanSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to retrieve pseudo-individual patient data (IPD) from published survival study results is important to facilitate meta-analysis, evidence synthesis or secondary data analyses for the purpose of decision modeling for cost effectiveness analysis. While established methods exist for retrieving pseudo-IPD from Kaplan-Meier plots, these algorithms are not easily extendable to other types of survival data, nor do they allow all available information to be incorporated. An optimization-based approach is proposed where the task of reconstructing the IPD is formulated as a quadratic program (QP) with linear constraints. The method easily allows auxiliary information such as marked censoring times. Moreover, the same approach can be used to reconstruct patient-level competing risks survival data from published cumulative incidence functions. In simulation, the QP-based method is shown to outperform existing algorithms particularly when data on numbers at risk and marked censoring times are available. The methods are illustrated through reconstruction of data from a published study on patients with advanced stage follicular lymphoma.

Indexed as

Programming, LinearAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphoma, FollicularMeta-Analysis as TopicModels, StatisticalRisk AssessmentSurvival Analysiscompeting risks analysispseudo‐individual patient dataquadratic programmingsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41775249
PMCPMC12956426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.