ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Self-reporting quality of life in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia: Comparing capability and health-focused measures using response process validation.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCapability measures offer theoretical advantages for assessing wellbeing in health economics and outcomes research, yet their feasibility for self-reporting by people living with dementia remains to be established. This exploratory study compares the feasibility of self-reporting on capability versus health-focused quality of life measures among people living with mild-tomoderate dementia, using response process validation.
methodsTwenty-three community-dwelling participants living with Alzheimer's disease (n = 11) or Lewy body dementia (n = 12) completed four measures using concurrent think-aloud cognitive interviewing: two capability measures (ICECAP-O, ICECAP-SCM) and two health-focused measures (QoL-AD, and AQoL-4D). Errors were coded using Tourangeau's four-stage response model (comprehension, retrieval, judgement, response). Completion times, support requirements, and error patterns were compared across measures and diagnostic groups.
resultsCapability measures showed higher error rates (13.7-18.3%) than health-related measures (5.1-8.4%) despite shorter completion times. Comprehension errors (51.2% of all errors) were most common across all measures, particularly for abstract concepts like dignity and doing things that make you feel valued. Retrieval errors were rare (4.9%), suggesting memory is not the primary barrier. Diagnostic groups showed distinct error profiles. Participants living with Lewy body dementia showed higher rates of comprehension errors (57.4% vs 42.9%), whilst participants living with Alzheimer's disease showed more response-selection difficulties (25.7% vs 14.9%).
conclusionsWhile self-reporting remains feasible in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia, capability measures pose greater cognitive demands than health-focused measures, primarily due to comprehension of abstract concepts and distinguishing capability from functioning rather than memory retrieval. Measures should be validated for specific dementia subtypes, and hybrid approaches anchoring capability judgements in concrete experiences warrant exploration. This exploratory study provides preliminary response process validity evidence to inform measure selection in dementia research and clinical practice, ensuring people living with dementia can meaningfully participate in health economics and policy decisions that affect their care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.