Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41774914›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Draw-Care, a Co-Designed Multilingual Digital Intervention for Family Carers of People Living With Dementia From Ethnically Diverse Communities: User-Testing Study.

Antonia Thodis, Thu Ha Dang, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Nalika Ulapane, Claudia Cooper, Briony Dow, Duncan Stuart Mortimer, Tuan Anh Nguyen, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Josefine Antoniades and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Antonia ThodisThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1197-062X
Thu Ha DangSchool of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9105-6920
Nilmini WickramasingheSchool of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1314-8843
Nalika UlapaneSchool of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3432-3943
Claudia CooperWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2777-7616
Briony DowNational Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-314X
Duncan Stuart MortimerCentre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7211-6454
Tuan Anh NguyenSchool of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9528-9278
Lily Dongxia XiaoCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4631-2443
Josefine AntoniadesSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4658-1405
Andrew Simon GilbertNational Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0525-8516
Joanne EnticottMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-5690
Mary GurgoneAssociation for Culturally Appropriate Services, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-1930-9878
Mathew VargheseSt John's Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5670-5710
Santosh LoganathanNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0009-0003-0646-8405
Bianca Brijnath *School of Humanities and Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0536-6859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnology can deliver culturally and linguistically appropriate resources to support ethnically diverse family carers (hereafter referred to as carers) of people living with dementia. However, carers' involvement in research on the development and evaluation of such digital health interventions is limited.

objectiveThis study aims to user-test the co-designed Draw-Care multilingual, web-based dementia resource with and for carers.

methodsWe evaluated the web-based resource through observation sessions to collect carer feedback, using a mixed methods approach. This comprised the online, validated eHealth Literacy Scale and survey questions assessing the perceived usefulness and importance of the internet for health-related decision-making and access to health resources. In addition, "think-aloud" website navigation sessions were conducted, and Hotjar analytics were used to capture participants' behavior on the website. Quantitative and analytics data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed using instant data analysis, followed by thematic analysis.

resultsBetween March and April 2023, a total of 30 carers participated in the user-testing sessions (women, n=20, 67%; mean age 61, SD 13.5 years). The mean eHealth Literacy Scale score was 30 (SD 6.1). Overall, 18 (60%) participants perceived the internet as useful, and laptops and tablets were the most commonly used devices for accessing resources, each used by 9 (30%) participants. Vietnamese (n=5, 17%), Mandarin (n=5, 17%), and English (n=5, 17%) were the top 3 languages the resource was accessed in. A total of 28 (93%) participants could navigate and log in to the website with little to no support. Qualitative results showed that overall, the Draw-Care web-based resource was acceptable, culturally responsive, engaging, and usable. However, navigation was more complicated for those using smaller screens (eg, smartphones and tablets). There were linguistic discrepancies arising from translation issues in Vietnamese and Mandarin, and 14 (46%) participants found it difficult to identify and use the chatbot (ie, virtual helper interface). Issues identified with the prototype Draw-Care website and the proposed improvements included eliminating the virtual helper, simplifying the rating scale from a 5-point smiling emoticon scale to a 3-star rating scale, improving the visibility of the feedback button, and ensuring translation accuracy.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate a bespoke multilingual website delivering a novel, co-designed, and culturally adapted digital intervention in 10 languages for ethnically diverse family carers of people living with dementia. Findings from this user-testing study undertaken with carers uncovered usability issues requiring remediation and emphasized the importance of inclusive, accessible, culturally sensitive, engaging, and beneficial content and design. Key revisions were implemented before the randomized controlled trial commenced. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1177/20552076231205733.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaMultilingualismAdultAgedDigital HealthDigital MediaEthnicityFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescarerco-designdementiadigital interventionethnically diverse

Identifiers

PMID41774914
PMCPMC12996899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.