ArticleJMIR human factors2026
Understanding Psychologists' Usage, Knowledge, and Attitudes Toward Digital Mental Health Solutions for Refugees and Migrants: Exploratory Cross-Sectional Survey in Sweden.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rising number of refugees and migrants has created growing mental health needs that health care systems struggle to address. Providing assessment and treatment for mental health problems in a digital format could help increase access to care and facilitate the provision of adapted interventions. Psychologists are key stakeholders in the delivery and influence of clinical services within routine care settings, but there are limited data on their perspectives regarding the use of digital solutions to assess and treat common mental health problems in refugees and migrants.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine psychologists' usage, knowledge, and attitudes toward digital mental health solutions for assessing and treating common mental health problems in refugees and migrants within the Swedish health care system.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted among psychologists in Sweden between December 2023 and February 2024. Responses included Likert-scale items and categorical variables, which were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t tests, and Fisher exact test to explore differences between subgroups.
resultsA total of 81 psychologists responded to the survey. Among them, 58 (72%) were women, and nearly half (40/81, 49%) worked in a public health care region. Respondents showed the highest acceptance for guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT), blended treatment, and videoconferencing therapy. Only 20% (16/81) reported using digital solutions for refugees or migrants with mental health problems. Most respondents had low or very low knowledge of digital assessment and screening (61/81, 75%) and digital treatment (58/81, 72%) for these groups. Those using digital formats for refugees and migrants, or working in a setting that did so, had significantly higher ratings on all 5 knowledge items compared to those that did not (P<.001 to P=.01). Respondents emphasized the importance of digital solutions being provided in refugees' and migrants' native languages (70/81, 86%) and being culturally adapted (56/81, 69%). Those using digital formats for refugees and migrants considered cultural adaptation less necessary (P=.05). The preferred implementation approach was through specialized or decentralized units in primary care (66/81, 81%).
conclusionsWhile psychologists recognize the potential of digital mental health solutions, significant barriers remain, including limited knowledge and experience with using digital formats for refugees and migrants. Psychologists prefer digital solutions in the native language of refugees and migrants that are implemented at the primary care level. The need for cultural adaptation should be further explored. Addressing psychologists' preferences could facilitate the future integration and implementation of digital formats for refugees and migrants in routine care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.