ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Clinical Case: Micro-drainage of subcutaneous emphysema Grade V through a fenestrated peripheral venous catheter in critical ill].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Approximately 30% of surgical procedures in the United States require orotracheal intubation. Generally laryngeal and tracheal injuries are rare. However, when they do occur, they can lead to major complications. Subcutaneous emphysema is the most common clinical presentation and is mostly treated conservatively and self-limiting. However, when it is Grade V, control strategies should be considered. There are reports in the literature on micro-drainage of subcutaneous emphysema through a fenestrated peripheral venous catheter with satisfactory results. Clinical case: We present the case of a 69-year-old diabetic man with hypertension and a history of pulmonary thromboembolism. He presented with a Grade II tracheal injury and Grade V subcutaneous emphysema. Micro-drainage of subcutaneous emphysema was performed through a size 14 peripheral venous catheter with fenestration, with adequate results. Conclusions: The peripheral venous catheter for microdrainage is a minimally invasive option for the treatment of grade V subcutaneous emphysema associated with tracheal injury. It can be a conservative strategy and, in some cases, can avoid the need for major interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.