ArticleEvaluation & the health professions2026
Romanian Adaptation and Validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory.
Article in Evaluation & the health professions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) is a complex self-report measurement tool designed to assess Acceptance and Commitment Therapy's (ACT) Hexaflex model components of psychological flexibility and inflexibility. There is a lack of literature on the invariance of the MPFI and its discriminant validity in relationship to second-wave therapy concepts such negative automatic thoughts. In this study, we present a Romanian adaptation and validation of the MPFI performed on a sample of 1109 participants from the general population. The results indicated an adequate fit to the data of the original MPFI factor model, high internal consistency levels, the ability to be invariant across levels of gender and age, and supported the MPFI's convergent, and discriminant. Some theory incongruent correlations emerged between MPFI dimensions and acceptance and experiential avoidance that suggest the need for further refinement of the MPFI. We discuss this unexpected correlation in relationship to explanatory factors such as the COVID lockdown context, personality, and age. Altogether, our results indicate that the Romanian version of the MPFI is a psychometrically sound instrument that can be used to study the Hexaflex ACT model and to evaluate psychological flexibility and inflexibility and their sub-processes in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.