Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41774856›Full record

ArticleChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2026

Impact of Docking Strand Design on Spatial Resolution in DNA-Points Accumulation for Imaging in Nanoscale Topography.

Dominic A Helmerich, Made Budiarta, Patrick Eiring, Markus Sauer, Sören Doose, Gerti Beliu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominic A HelmerichDepartment of Biotechnology and Biophysics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-1889-0406
Made BudiartaRudolf-Virchow-Center for Integrative and Translational Bioimaging (RVZ), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Patrick EiringDepartment of Biotechnology and Biophysics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Markus SauerDepartment of Biotechnology and Biophysics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sören DooseDepartment of Biotechnology and Biophysics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Gerti BeliuRudolf-Virchow-Center for Integrative and Translational Bioimaging (RVZ), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-9437-8806

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz KK5665801HV4European Bank for Reconstruction and Development BIOFITH2020 European Research Council 835102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA points accumulation for imaging in nanoscale topography (DNA-PAINT) has become a widely adopted single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) technique owing to its high spatial resolution, versatile labeling strategies, and theoretically unlimited multiplexing capability. Recent developments in repetitive docking strand designs have enabled faster image acquisition by increasing the number of potential binding motifs per target. However, the effect of such architectural modifications on effective spatial resolution remains largely unexplored. Here, we systematically quantify how repetitive docking strands influence localization distributions and effective resolution using the well-defined geometry of the trimeric proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) as a model system. Whereas classical single-motif docking strands resolve the expected ∼6 nm spacing between PCNA subunits with high precision, repetitive docking motifs produce broadened localization distributions, despite comparable localization precision. Our results suggest that spatial blurring arises from a combination of variable binding site geometry, rotational flexibility of elongated multivalent DNA docking sequences, as well as the dynamic behavior of imager strands. This study provides a quantitative framework for understanding how docking strand architecture determines resolution limits in DNA-PAINT and underscores the need to balance multiplexing and imaging speed with structural fidelity. Our results thus offer guidance for the rational design of docking strands for high-precision DNA-PAINT imaging of protein complexes.

Indexed as

DNAProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenSingle Molecule ImagingBinding SitesDNAProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenDNA points accumulation for imaging in nanoscale topographydocking strand designlocalization precisionnanoscopic resolutionsuper‐resolution microscopy

Identifiers

PMID41774856
PMCPMC12956271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.