ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Cooperation and the evolution of bacterial niche breadth.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolutionary and Ecological Consequences of Cooperation.The American naturalist · 2026Review
- Cooperation and the evolution of bacterial niche breadth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteria exhibit varying niche breadths, with generalists thriving in diverse environments and specialists confined to specific habitats. Although genes for cooperative traits have been suggested to influence niche breadth evolution, their precise role remains unclear. We used a combination of phylogeny-based comparative methods to test causal hypotheses about the directionality of the relationship between genes for cooperation and bacterial niche breadth evolution across 25,785 species. Our results revealed 1) a positive correlation between the proportion of genes for cooperation and niche breadth; 2) genes for cooperation influenced niche breadth evolution, with a decreased proportion of such genes promoting niche contraction as the predominant evolutionary direction; and 3) genes for cooperation experience more frequent gain and loss within species rather than across species. These findings suggest a role of bacterial cooperation in influencing niche breadth evolution and maintaining the ecological versatility of bacteria. While our results are consistent with a simple relationship under the hypotheses tested, more complex causal scenarios are possible, including the role of factors that influence both cooperation and niche breadth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.