ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Re-imagining health research to include the voices of justice-impacted individuals.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with prior justice system involvement experience health disparities, yet are often underrepresented in research. We sought to 1) explore the perspectives of individuals with prior justice involvement regarding research and science and 2) identify barriers to their participation in research. Focus groups with 67 participants from five advocacy groups across the United States revealed interest in research participation. To enable participation, researchers need to accommodate prior commitments and offer adequate compensation. Collaboration with advocacy organizations supporting justice-impacted individuals can facilitate recruitment and engagement goals. This study can inform optimal strategies for engaging individuals impacted by the justice system in research. The voices of justice-impacted individuals can provide diverse perspectives on health research programs and allow for the collection of meaningful data to understand the effects and possible solutions for severe health disparities in the United States.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.