ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
The underestimated burden of placental schistosomiasis in endemic regions: Findings from a cross-sectional, diagnostic proof-of-concept study on placental schistosomiasis in Gabon.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlacental schistosomiasis (PS) is underdiagnosed and may compromise maternal and neonatal health. This study estimated the prevalence of PS in a rural Gabonese population of pregnant women with confirmed S. haematobium infection using light microscopy of macerated placental tissue.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional, diagnostic proof-of-concept study which applied an improved placenta maceration technique in real-world conditions to diagnose PS. Performing light microscopic assessment of a single sample of 10 mL urine, we screened pregnant women for S. haematobium infection who sought antenatal care in Lambaréné (Gabon) between January 2022 and January 2023. Women positive for S. haematobium infection were followed up until delivery. Additionally, a subsample of women with negative urine samples was recruited as a non-infected control group (1:1 ratio infected and non-infected groups) and followed up until delivery. Only participants with available macerated placental samples were considered for final analysis. Placental samples were subjected to light-microscopy-based screening for S. haematobium eggs and PS was considered present if a least one S. haematobium egg was detected. Positive light microscopic placental samples were confirmed by qPCR.
resultsAmong 318 women screened for S. haematobium in urine, we found 40 (12.6%; 95% CI: 9.1-16.7%) to be positive. Together with 40 women in the non-infected control group all women were followed up until delivery. After loss-to-follow-up, 28 (70%; 28/40) women with S. haematobium infection and 20 (50%; 20/40) without infection provided placenta samples at delivery. In the group with S. haematobium infection, 14% (4/28; 95% CI: 4.0-32.7%) of women were positive for S. haematobium eggs in macerated placenta tissue. In the non-infected control group, one woman (5%; 1/20; 95% CI: 0.1-24.9%) had a positive microscopy result for PS. All five women with positive S. haematobium egg microscopy in placental tissue received a concordant qPCR result.
conclusion14% of women with S. haematobium infection also had PS. Notably, PS was also observed in 5% of women without detectable S. haematobium eggs in urine. This suggests that PS could be an underestimated phenomenon in highly endemic regions and warrants further investigations of its implications for mother-and-child health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.