Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41774725›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

RETRACTED: A novel method based on clustering and decision-making for construction project portfolio selection.

Mohammad Khalilzadeh, Peyman Taebi, Ali Heidari

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad KhalilzadehCENTRUM Católica Graduate Business School, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-2373-8505
Peyman TaebiSchool of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Ali HeidariSchool of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8714-125X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, the problem of project portfolio selection is one of the important tasks in many construction organizations, especially project-based ones. On the other hand, project portfolio selection usually faces many challenges due to the complexity of project evaluation as well as limited resources. The present research aims to present a new method based on clustering and decision-making for project portfolio selection in project-based companies. The proposed integrated method includes the K-means method for clustering projects, the SWARA method for prioritizing the identified criteria, and the MULTIMOORA method for ranking and selecting the projects of the studied company. In addition, the results of the MULTIMOORA method was compared with the results of the WASPAS method for verification. First, five criteria (including 18 sub-criteria) were selected using literature review and expert judgment for clustering and ranking project portfolios. Then, the research data was collected from a questionnaire containing identified criteria and sub-criteria. Based on the obtained results, 25 available construction projects were placed and ranked in 4 clusters. The findings show that the proposed integrated method was able to cluster the project portfolios and select the best project portfolios by ranking the project portfolios based on the identified criteria and sub-criteria. Also, the findings indicate that the rankings using five main criteria were different from the rankings using 18 sub-criteria, and therefore due to the nature of the sub-criteria and the importance of paying attention to the "desirability or undesirability of the criteria/sub-criteria in using the MULTIMOORA", the rankings using the sub-criteria were more preferable.

Indexed as

Construction IndustryDecision MakingCluster AnalysisClustering Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41774725
PMCPMC12956132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.