ArticlePloS one2026
Person-centered practice in the Portuguese healthcare system: A documentary study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerson-centered practice has increasingly become a key structural component of health systems, driving the progressive reformulation of public health policies internationally. Despite broad consensus regarding its importance, its integration into clinical practice continues to face significant challenges. The Person-Centred Practice Framework identifies the macro context as a critical domain for sustainable implementation, as it encompasses the structural and strategic factors that shape healthcare delivery.
objectiveTo characterize the person-centered practice framing within the macro context of the Portuguese healthcare system. METHODOLOGY: Qualitative, descriptive, and retrospective documentary study. A systematic literature search was conducted on the websites of entities responsible for defining, guiding, and regulating healthcare in Portugal. Using predefined eligibility criteria, 40 documents were selected. Textual analysis was performed using IRAMUTEQ® software and guided by the constructs of the macro context domain of the Person-Centred Practice Framework.
resultsThe lexicometric analysis identified five classes, grouped into two thematic fields: i) Structural and organizational determinants of person-centered practice, comprising the classes Systemic vision and integrated response, Organizational culture and participation, Digital transformation and information management, and Political vision and governance structures; and ii) Operationalization of person-centered practice, represented solely by the class Care approach, reflecting its thematic specificity. Factorial analysis revealed distinct and poorly connected discursive patterns associated with different action levels within the healthcare system. Similarity analysis highlighted a discourse centered on the health-care-person nucleus, showing relations with service organization, care integration, and person participation, albeit with word dispersion suggesting misalignment between organizational and practice levels.
conclusionThe macrocontextual framing of person-centered practice in the Portuguese healthcare system demonstrates significant political and strategic advances, as seen in the emphasis on humanized care, investment in health literacy and digitalization, and the introduction of Integrated Care Pathways. However, implementation remains limited due to the absence of clear formative guidelines, biomedical paradigm persistence, and lack of evaluation mechanisms sensitive to care experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.