ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring the relationship between mental health and urban green space soundscapes: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban soundscapes, particularly those experienced in green spaces, have been increasingly recognized as factors that influence human mental health. This scoping review explores the existing literature on soundscapes within urban green spaces and their associated mental health outcomes. It aims to classify the methodologies used in this domain, identify mental health outcomes related to urban green space soundscapes, and examine specific soundscape elements and their correlations with mental health. A systematic search of peer-reviewed studies was conducted. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Diverse methodological approaches were identified, with an emphasis on quantitative multi-method designs. Commonly studied mental health outcomes include stress reduction, mood enhancement, perceived restorativeness, and cognitive restoration. Standardized psychometric tools, such as the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and Perceived Restorativeness Soundscape Scale (PRSS) are frequently used as outcome measures. Natural soundscape elements such as birdsong, water sounds, and rustling leaves had a positive association with relaxation and perceived mental restoration throughout all studies, while mechanical sounds, such as traffic noise were linked to adverse mental health outcomes. These findings highlight that natural soundscapes in urban green spaces have a potential positive relationship with mental health by reducing stress and enhancing mood. However, the cross-sectional design and methodological heterogeneity of the included studies limit causal interpretation. Future research should explore multi-sensory experiences and examine soundscapes in diverse urban contexts to provide more robust insights into their relationship with mental health. The practical implications suggest that urban planners should prioritize integrating natural sound elements into urban areas to improve mental health. The study protocol of this scoping review had been registered at OSF (osf.io/4r7gd).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.