ArticlePloS one2026
Real-world clinical effectiveness of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for primary prophylaxis of pneumocystis pneumonia in non-hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with rituximab.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- B Cells and B Cell Depletion in Autoimmunity and Atherosclerosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are no definitive clinical practice guidelines regarding the necessity and dosage of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in individuals undergoing rituximab therapy. This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of various TMP-SMX prophylactic dosing regimens over a 1-year period in 690 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with rituximab at a university hospital in Thailand from 2013 to 2022. Out of these patients, 622 (90.1%) received TMP/SMX, with a mean duration of prophylaxis of 265.7 days (SD 85.66). The overall incidence of PJP was 1% (7 patients), which was significantly higher in the non-prophylaxis group (5.8%, 4 patients) compared to the prophylaxis group (0.6%, 3 patients). No cases of PJP occurred among those receiving standard prophylaxis or a single-strength tablet every other day, three times a week. However, instances in the prophylaxis cohort were reported in patients who took two single-strength tablets twice daily, twice a week. Prophylaxis resulted in a significant reduction in the one-year incidence of PJP, with a hazard ratio of 0.105 (95% CI: 0.023-0.469). Mild adverse reactions were noted in 3.05% of patients, all of whom recovered. These findings suggest that TMP/SMX prophylaxis was associated with a lower incidence of PJP and was well tolerated. Future studies should explore optimal dosing strategies while considering patient selection bias and concurrent immunosuppressive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.