ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Low use of data analytics for health sector priority-setting in Ghana: A case for strengthening analytical capacity.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ghana has implemented health sector reforms to improve health care access in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal 3. However, Ghana's health sector faces challenges including persistent overspending of the healthcare budget. These challenges are exacerbated by recent cuts in external aid to Ghana, illustrating the importance of effective health sector priority-setting (HSPS)-the process of determining how to allocate resources best to maximize population health outcomes among various alternative, competing health needs and interventions. Although Ghana has a history of HSPS initiatives, there is no authoritative source on the current landscape of HSPS in Ghana and on the use of data and analytics. Combining key informant interviews with an extensive literature review, this study aimed to provide an overview of current HSPS processes at the national level in Ghana, focusing on the use of data and analytics. Eight interviewees were selected from governmental health institutions, development partner organizations and academia through a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Findings show some good practices regarding the use of data and analytics for HSPS in Ghana, including the existence of a routine health database for Ghana Health Service (GHS) facilities, existence of training programs on data collection for GHS staff and some use of subnational data for national-level decision making. However, many interviews showed that the use of data and analytics for HSPS was low mainly due to low analytical capacity within the GHS and MoH, donor and political influences on the process, and a fragmented health data system. Interviewees recommended the following to increase the use of data and analytics in HSPS: 1) increase training in data analytics and data-driven decision-making, particularly among senior-level staff in the GHS and Ministry of Health, 2) establish a centralized health research coordination agency, and 3) integrate and coordinate health databases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.