ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Cervical Cancer Screening in Uganda: Determinants of Past Screening and Post-Education Uptake; A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cancer Prevention, Control, and Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Progress and Challenges.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionCervical cancer (CC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in Uganda, largely due to late diagnosis. CC screening (CCS) is key to preventing these deaths. Awareness of past CCS, its determinants, and uptake of CCS after receiving information is crucial to informing prevention programming.MethodsA two-phase community based cross-sectional survey was conducted among 600 randomly selected women aged 25-65 years, from two Ugandan districts (Mukono and Wakiso). Participants completed a baseline questionnaire that assessed their knowledge, attitudes, and past practices related to CCS. Information on cervical cancer and screening was provided during and after the survey to encourage uptake, which was assessed three months later. Logistic regression identified factors associated with past CCS and follow-up uptake after information giving.ResultsFew women [5.3%, (32/600)] were aware that Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection causes CC. Past CCS was low [22.3%, (134/600)], associated with the age group 36-65 years (AOR= 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 - 3.2), owning a mobile telephone (AOR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.4 - 3.9), residing in a household headed by someone with tertiary or higher education (AOR=2.6, 95% CI 1.3 - 5.0), self-reported HIV infection (AOR=10.5, 95% CI 5.2 - 21.3), awareness of the location of CCS services (AOR=3.2, 95% CI 1.3 - 7.8), and awareness that accessing the CCS location was not expensive (AOR=2.3, 95% CI 1.3 - 4.0).The uptake of CCS following information provision was 40.3%, (236/585), associated with employment (AOR=2.7, 95% CI 1.2 - 5.8), moderate-high income (AOR=1.6, 95% CI 1.0 - 2.6), and prior receipt of CCS services (AOR 6.7, 95% CI 4.0 -11.2).ConclusionCCS remains low but is higher among women with better socioeconomic status, awareness of services, and HIV infection. Targeted strategies addressing awareness and motivating women to get screened can boost screening uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.