ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
Predictive value of the
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePathological upgrading is common in men with ISUP Grade Group (GG) 1 prostate cancer due to sampling limitations. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 71 patients with biopsy-proven GG1 prostate adenocarcinoma, PSA < 20 ng/mL, and
resultsPathological upgrading occurred in 45/71 patients (63.4%). Upgrading rates increased markedly across PRIMARY score categories: 25% for scores ≤ 3, 81.3% for score 4, and 100% for score 5 (p < 0.001). A PRIMARY score ≥ 4 demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.979), with 97.8% sensitivity, 88.5% specificity, 93.6% PPV, 95.6% NPV, and 94.3% accuracy. SUVmax (AUC = 0.944) and PI-RADS ≥ 4 (AUC = 0.721) were also associated with upgrading; however, in multivariate analysis, only the PRIMARY score remained an independent predictor (OR: 19.9; 95% CI: 2.92-135.28; p = 0.002).
conclusion"The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.