ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Improving In Silico Cardiac Safety Prediction by Consensus Averaging of Transmural Ventricular Cell Models.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEstablished in silico frameworks for assessing Torsade de Pointes (TdP) risk primarily rely on single-cell electrophysiological biomarkers, which have demonstrated strong predictive capabilities. However, ventricular transmural electrophysiological heterogeneity is known to influence repolarization dynamics and arrhythmogenic mechanisms. Explicitly incorporating endocardium, epicardium, and mid-myocardium representations may enhance physiological interpretability, but direct integration of multi-cell features can introduce severe multicollinearity and compromise model stability. To address this challenge, we propose an ordinal logistic regression (OLR) framework that integrates multi-cell qNet information through probability averaging, preserving physiological context while maintaining robust statistical behavior.
methods
resultsFor CiPA-ORd v1.0 using the ChanTest dataset, qNet achieved substantial performance, with AUCs for ROC1 and ROC2 of 1.000 and 0.958, respectively, and also meeting seven "excellent" classification criteria. In the ORd model, probability averaging consistently improved performance for both the Manual and ChanTest datasets relative to single-cell and direct multi-cell approaches.
conclusionProbability-averaged integration of multi-cell qNet predictions mitigates multicollinearity while preserving physiological relevance, yielding more stable and accurate in silico TdP risk classification and supporting broader applicability to preclinical safety assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41774378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.