ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2026
Aesthetic injustice in healthcare: exploring testimonial and hermeneutical forms.
Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces and develops the concepts of aesthetic testimonial injustice and aesthetic hermeneutical injustice, arguing that understanding the aesthetic dimensions of human experience, specifically those concerning physical appearance, is central to justice in healthcare practice. Drawing on Miranda Fricker's framework of epistemic injustice, the paper provides a bridge between emerging literature on aesthetic injustice, which is often focused on lookism and appearance-based discrimination, and accounts that emphasize the recognition of individuals as aesthetic subjects. The concept of aesthetic testimonial injustice relates to the unjust discrediting of a person's aesthetic testimony regarding their own body, often due to biases related to attractiveness, age or disability. Aesthetic hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, pertains to the structural disadvantage faced by individuals who lack the interpretive resources to make sense of or communicate their aesthetic experience as it pertains to bodily appearance, particularly in healthcare contexts. Using examples from prosthetics design, nursing care and disorders of visual perception, the paper shows how healthcare systems can marginalize patients' aesthetic values and perceptions, thereby undermining their dignity and agency. It concludes by calling for a deeper understanding of aesthetics in bioethics, suggesting that respecting patients as embodied aesthetic agents can enhance ethical healthcare delivery and counter systemic injustice. The concepts of aesthetic testimonial injustice and aesthetic hermeneutical injustice thus expand bioethical discourse by highlighting the moral significance of aesthetic experience in healthcare contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.