ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
An evaluation of flipped classroom-based anatomy teaching in medical students.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnatomy education forms a cornerstone of medical curricula, integrating theoretical knowledge with practical understanding. The flipped classroom model, an innovative and interactive pedagogical strategy, has gained increasing attention for promoting active learning, engagement, and long-term knowledge retention. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the flipped classroom model on learning performance, student engagement, and perceptions of digital learning tools in anatomy education.
methodsA total of 194 second- and third-year medical students participated during the 2024-2025 academic year (94 second-year and 100 third-year students). Flipped classroom sessions focused on the cerebral hemispheres (second year) and the pelvis and perineum (third year). Preparatory materials were provided via Moodle at least 15 days before the sessions. Student performance was assessed through a 20-question formative quiz graded out of 10 marks and related items in the final committee examination. Post-session perceptions were gathered using a 14-item Likert-scale questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests.
resultsAverage quiz scores were 8.4 for second-year and 8.3 for third-year students, while committee exam accuracy was 78% and 70.06%, respectively. Over 75% of students reported that the flipped classroom enhanced their understanding and engagement. Significant differences were observed between year groups in enjoyment (p = 0.004) and perceived support for independent learning (p = 0.004). More than 70% agreed that digital anatomy resources improved comprehension and confidence.
conclusionThe flipped classroom model enhances engagement, independent learning, and comprehension in anatomy education. This digitally supported, student-centred approach promotes deeper cognitive involvement and supports the integration of hybrid learning models into future curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41774341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.