ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Deep learning ensemble models for CT-based differentiation of malignant and benign sacral bone tumors: development and evaluation.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRadiologists often face challenges in differentiating benign from malignant sacral bone lesions due to their similar imaging characteristics. This study aimed to develop an ensemble deep learning (DL) model that can preoperatively distinguish between benign and malignant sacral tumors using noncontrast computed tomography images. MATERIALS AND
methodsPreoperative sacral CT scans from 569 patients with confirmed sacral lesions were analyzed. Data from Center 1 were utilized in model development and internal test via fivefold cross-validation, and those from Centers 2 and 3 were employed in external test. Various ensemble models combining human-readable interpretation and DL were developed. The diagnostic performance of the models and radiologists was assessed using metrics such as precision, recall, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), F1 score, and confusion matrix. Furthermore, the clinical benefits derived from radiologists' interpretations and supported by the DL model were evaluated.
resultsThe ensemble model, which integrates 3D-DenseNet121 with human interpretation, exhibited the most robust performance. The ensemble model demonstrated high performance on the internal and external test sets and achieved AUCs of 0.9139 and 0.8713, F1 scores of 0.9054 and 0.8571, precision of 0.9041 and 0.8824, recall of 0.9136 and 0.8333, and accuracy of 0.8630 and 0.8182, respectively. Across the external test cohort, all radiologists experienced improvements in AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Notably, junior radiologists demonstrated significant improvements compared with senior radiologists.
conclusionThe potential clinical application of the DL model lies in its capacity to considerably enhance the diagnostic efficiency of radiologists. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study presents the first ensemble deep learning model integrating 3D-DenseNet121 with radiologists' interpretation for preoperative differentiation of sacral tumors on noncontrast CT that improved diagnostic performance across all experience levels, particularly for junior radiologists. KEY POINTS: First artificial intelligence-radiologist ensemble for noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT)-based sacral tumor classification. Boosts all radiologists' performance, with the greatest gains for juniors, potentially reducing referrals. Enables reliable NCCT diagnosis, overcoming contrast/magnetic resonance imaging dependency in musculoskeletal oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.