Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41774306›Full record

SynthesisAIDS and behavior2026

Barriers and Facilitators Influencing PrEP Uptake Among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Amit Mickey Dhir, Amteshwar Singh, Steven J Clipman, Jason E Farley

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amit Mickey DhirCenter for Infectious Disease and Nursing Innovation, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. adhir1@jhmi.edu.
Amteshwar SinghDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Steven J ClipmanDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Jason E FarleyCenter for Infectious Disease and Nursing Innovation, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALLISON L AGWU · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) have high HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness, yet uptake rates remain extremely low. This signifies the presence of certain barriers not yet addressed in policy and practice and facilitators not yet utilized in designing effective interventions. This systematic review used the Gelberg and Andersen Model of Vulnerable Populations as a theoretical framework to explore barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake among MSM and TGW in the US. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science in May 2025 to identify eligible studies exploring barriers and/or facilitators to PrEP uptake among MSM and TGW in the US. Studies published in 2012 onward in the English language and particularly focusing on uptake (initiation) met the eligibility criteria. We excluded studies focused on awareness, willingness, adherence, persistence, and other components of the PrEP care continuum. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 Statement. Barriers and facilitators reported in studies were mapped into the domains of the Gelberg and Andersen model and then narratively synthesized using a thematic approach. Eleven studies (9 qualitative and two mixed methods) met the eligibility criteria. Utilizing the Gelberg and Andersen model, within the predisposing factors domain, three themes emerged, namely (a) PrEP knowledge, health beliefs, and misinformation, (b) stigma, discrimination, and trust, and (c) influence of social environment and lived realities. Within the enabling factors domain, three themes emerged, namely (a) financial access and insurance coverage, (b) healthcare provider and system factors, and (c) addressing specific community needs and systemic vulnerabilities. Finally, within the need factors domain, one theme emerged, namely perceived versus evaluated need for PrEP. Additionally, a sub-group analysis showed that Black and Latino TGW may experience additional barriers to PrEP uptake due to intersecting stigma related to race, sexuality, and HIV and scarcity of culturally competent and gender-affirming care. Also, rural MSM may experience additional barriers due to reliance on urban social networks for information and support because of lack of such networks and support tailored to their geographical location. The findings of this review reveal an intricate interplay between predisposing, enabling, and need factors, which aligning with the observations that although PrEP awareness among MSM and TGW has grown, significant gaps in knowledge and misinformation remain, and uptake remains extremely low. These factors extend beyond general awareness levels and hence must be addressed through policy and practice interventions to enhance HIV prevention efforts among this key population in the US.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePre-Exposure ProphylaxisTransgender PersonsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleSocial StigmaUnited StatesAnti-HIV AgentsBarriersFacilitatorsHIVMSMPrEPTransgender women

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.