Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41774282›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2026

CAGAD: dynamic community attention for prediction gene regulatory network.

Sura I Mohammed Ali, Sura Zaki AlRashid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sura I Mohammed AliDepartment of Software, College of Information Technology, University of Babylon, Babylon, 51001, Iraq. suraibrahimm.sw@student.uobabylon.edu.iq.
Sura Zaki AlRashidDepartment of Software, College of Information Technology, University of Babylon, Babylon, 51001, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One major issue with deep learning is that graph neural networks (GNNs) have a tendency to identify indirect and multi-level complicated associations between genes, which make them more difficult to interpret. Furthermore, it is still difficult to incorporate biological prior knowledge-such as known regulatory patterns and gene expression data into deep learning models, which limits the interpretability and prediction power of current approaches. As a result, building robust GRNs that can handle measurement error remains a major open challenge. To address this issue, we propose the CAGAD framework for graph neural networks. It integrates a community attention mechanism with GraphSAGE. The technique creates practical low-dimensional embeddings using data on gene expression and known gene relationships. We can more clearly and accurately predict gene interactions thanks to these embeddings, which also simplify modeling efforts. This study introduces a novel Community Attention Mechanism that improves prediction accuracy by leveraging both structural and community-level characteristics. Experimental results show that CAGAD outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on benchmark datasets of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. There is more faith in the model's capacity to discover new gene connections. Additionally, the learned embeddings capture the underlying structure of diverse and massive GRNs, which improves the value of downstream evaluations and provides additional biological information.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDeep LearningEscherichia coliGraph Neural NetworksModels, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiological prior knowledgeDynamic Community AttentionGene expressionGene Regulatory Networks (GRNs)Graph neural network

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.