ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Position paper on prehabilitation in Germany].
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prehabilitation is gaining increasing importance as an integral component of modern, patient-centered perioperative care. The objective of this position paper is to outline the current national and international state of prehabilitation, to highlight existing barriers to its implementation and to provide practical recommendations for clinical application. Particularly in older, multimorbid and oncology patients, targeted preoperative interventions, such as exercise therapy, nutritional support, psychological counselling, and additional measures, can contribute to reducing postoperative complications, accelerating recovery and improving the quality of life. Despite the growing body of international evidence, implementation in Germany has so far been slow, often hindered by a lack of reimbursement structures and limited resources. This paper therefore advocates a stepwise introduction of prehabilitation measures, tailored to high-risk groups and aligned with local healthcare reality. It is emphasized that prehabilitation should not be regarded as an isolated intervention but as an integrative element within established concepts such as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and rehabilitation. Furthermore, the paper addresses the need for national networking, harmonized standards, digital solutions and structural as well as political support to ensure sustainable integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.