ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Staging and imaging-based prognostication in renal cell carcinoma: current guidelines and practical considerations.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging-based staging is a key component of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management, yet anatomic labels alone do not fully capture tumor biology. This review highlights key aspects of RCC staging using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), compares their use across major guidelines, and explores how integrating imaging-based prognostic markers can refine preoperative risk assessment. We summarize the pragmatic use of multiphase CT and MRI for T-staging, highlight pitfalls, and outline indications for chest and ancillary imaging based on American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We also discuss imaging-based prognostic biomarkers, including central non-enhancement and enhancement heterogeneity, diffusion metrics, and radiomic signatures, and we describe how they correlate with outcomes such as tumor grade, stage, molecular features, and survival. In addition, we dive into future directions, focusing on the potential integration of advanced technologies (e.g., photon-counting detector CT, [89Zr] Zr-deferoxamine (DFO)-girentuximab positron emission tomography/CT), integration with liquid biopsy, and development of standardized reporting systems focusing on cancer likelihood and aggressiveness (e.g., Kidney Imaging Reporting and Data System). By bridging staging descriptors with prognostic phenotypes, we aim to standardize reports, better inform management, and improve decision-making for patients with RCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41774135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.