ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Early recurrence prediction and risk stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization achieving imaging complete response based on contrast-enhanced CT machine learning.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate machine learning (ML) models using clinical and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) parameters to assess recurrence risk in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) achieving imaging complete response (CR).
methods122 HCC patients who underwent TACE and achieved imaging CR from two centers were divided into the development (n = 100) and external validation dataset (n = 22). Recurrence free survival (RFS) was tracked, and patients were categorized into early recurrence (ER) and non-ER groups based on a 1-year cutoff. Forty clinical and CECT parameters were collected and screened. Six ML models were constructed and compared using the area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Key parameters were used to construct a Cox regression nomogram and stratify recurrence risk using log-rank test.
resultsThe extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated the best predictive performance based on 13 parameters, with AUCs of 0.913 and 0.812 for the internal and external validation datasets. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified the top 10 parameters. The Cox regression nomogram was constructed with ECV, complete capsule, FIB-4 index, tumor size, platelet-to-neutrophil ratio, and delayed phase tumor CT value. Log-rank test demonstrated significant risk stratification in both datasets (both p < 0.01).
conclusionThe XGBoost-based ER prediction model identifies 1-year recurrence following TACE with imaging CR. The Cox regression nomogram enables risk stratification, dividing patients into three subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41774134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.