Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41774094›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

3D guided large osteochondral allograft reconstructions for post-traumatic osteoarticular bone loss of the knee: a technical note.

Nick Assink, Hugo C van der Veen, Job N Doornberg, Peter A J Pijpker, Frank F A IJpma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nick Assink3D Lab, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BB75, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands. n.assink@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-6816
Hugo C van der VeenDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1305-8968
Job N DoornbergDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-2742
Peter A J Pijpker3D Lab, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BB75, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9543-1097
Frank F A IJpmaDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9420-2732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePost-traumatic osteoarticular bone loss of the knee remains challenging to treat. Allograft reconstruction can yield favourable outcomes, and 3D virtual surgical planning may further improve results by enabling precise templating, optimal graft selection, and accurate fixation. This study aimed to introduce and evaluate 3D-assisted planning for knee allograft reconstruction.

methodsIn two patients with severe post-traumatic knee osteoarticular bone loss—one in the medial distal femur and one in the proximal tibial plateau—3D-assisted resection and allograft reconstruction were performed. An allograft was matched to the affected condyle, after which cutting planes were defined and patient-specific guides were designed. Postoperative CT-scans were obtained to assess accuracy, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with the Lower Extremity Functional scale(LEFS) questionnaire.

resultsBoth surgical procedures went uneventful. In the lateral plateau case, 3D analysis of the postoperative CT scan showed a maximum translational deviation from the plan of 2.2 mm and a maximum rotational deviation of 3.2°. In the medial distal femur case, postoperative 3D assessment revealed a maximum translational deviation of 2.5 mm and a maximum rotational error of 3.5°. Functional outcomes (> 1 year postop) were favourable, with LEFS scores improving from 29/100 to 78/100 in the lateral plateau case and from 22/100 to 81/100 in the medial distal femur case.

conclusionIn conclusion, this technical note demonstrates the feasibility and accuracy of 3D-assisted planning for knee allograft reconstruction. The approach enables precise allograft placement and anatomical restoration.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationImaging, Three-DimensionalKnee InjuriesOsteoarthritis, KneePlastic Surgery ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAdultAllograftsFemurHumansMaleTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID41774094
PMCPMC12957053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.