Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41773962›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2026

Toward total recall: Enhancing data FAIRness through AI-driven metadata standardization.

Sowmya S Sundaram, Rafael S Gonçalves, Mark A Musen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sowmya S SundaramStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, 3180 Porter Drive, California 94304, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0086-7582
Rafael S GonçalvesStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, 3180 Porter Drive, California 94304, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-0125
Mark A MusenStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, 3180 Porter Drive, California 94304, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-793X

Funding

The Metadata Powerwash - Integrated tools to make biomedical data FAIRR01LM013498 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013498U.S. National Library of Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific metadata often suffer from incompleteness, inconsistency, and formatting errors, which hinder effective discovery and reuse of the associated datasets. We present a method that combines Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) with structured metadata templates from the Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval (CEDAR) knowledge base to automatically standardize metadata and to ensure compliance with established standards. A CEDAR template specifies the expected fields of a metadata submission and their permissible values. Our standardization process involves using CEDAR templates to guide the GPT-4 in accurately correcting and refining metadata entries in bulk, resulting in significant improvements in metadata retrieval performance, especially in recall-the proportion of relevant datasets retrieved from the total relevant datasets available. Using the BioSample and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repositories maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), we demonstrate that retrieval of datasets whose metadata are altered by GPT-4 when provided with CEDAR templates (GPT-4+CEDAR) is substantially better than retrieval of datasets whose metadata are in their original state and that of datasets whose metadata are altered using GPT-4 with only data-dictionary guidance (GPT-4+DD). The average recall increases dramatically, from 17.65% with baseline raw metadata to 62.87% with GPT-4+CEDAR. Furthermore, we evaluate the robustness of our approach by comparing GPT-4 against other large language models, including LLaMA-3 and MedLLaMA2, demonstrating consistent performance advantages for GPT-4+CEDAR. These results underscore the transformative potential of combining advanced language models with symbolic models of standardized metadata structures for more effective and reliable data retrieval, thus accelerating scientific discoveries and data-driven research.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalMetadataBiocurationData CurationGenerative Artificial IntelligenceLarge Language ModelsSoftwareFAIRinformation retrievallarge language modelsmetadatanatural language processingstandards

Identifiers

PMID41773962
PMCPMC13108262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.