Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41773925›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic entomology2026

Biological costs and benefits of selective breeding for disease resistance using marker-assisted or field-based selective breeding in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Robert W Currie, Lynae P Ovinge, Derek Micholson, Abdullah Ibrahim, Michael Peirson, Heather Higo, Elizabeth Huxter, Maria Marta Guarna, Leonard J Foster, Stephen F Pernal and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert W CurrieDepartment of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1146-900X
Lynae P OvingeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-7335-924X
Derek MicholsonDepartment of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3367-8515
Abdullah IbrahimAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Beaverlodge Research Farm, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada.
Michael PeirsonAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Beaverlodge Research Farm, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-4020-5879
Heather HigoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Elizabeth HuxterDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Maria Marta GuarnaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4638-9475
Leonard J FosterDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Stephen F PernalAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Beaverlodge Research Farm, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0290-4391
Shelley E HooverDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9462-7039

Funding

AAFC J-000728BeeIPM 107BEEGenome CanadaGenome Canada and Genome BC through the BeeIPM project 107BEEUniversity of Manitoba
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) breeders seek to enhance disease resistance by selecting for behavioral resistance traits such as hygienic behavior and Varroa-sensitive hygiene. However, traditional phenotypic assays for these traits are labor-intensive, limiting scalability. Antennal protein biomarkers correlated with these behaviors offer a promising tool for marker-assisted selection (MAS), potentially increasing phenotyping efficiency and accelerating genetic gains. This study evaluated the performance of honey bee colonies from 4 stocks: those selected using field-based phenotypic assays (FAS) or MAS, versus unselected domestic stock (BEN) or imported commercial (IMP) stock. Colonies were situated across 3 distinct geographic regions and were managed with or without acaricide treatment for the treatment of Varroa destructor mites to assess both the benefits of resistance under parasitic stress and potential fitness costs under low-stress conditions. Across regions, MAS and FAS stocks performed comparably in productivity and pathogen metrics and were equal to or more productive than the unselected BEN and IMP stocks. At specific locations and time points, MAS and FAS colonies maintained significantly lower Varroa destructor populations in the absence of acaricides, demonstrating enhanced natural mite suppression. Selection for hygienic behavior was positively associated with colony health and fitness, with no evidence of biologically meaningful trade-offs. Increased overwinter food consumption in selected colonies reflected larger fall populations rather than a direct cost of resistance.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceSelective BreedingVarroidaeAcaricidesAnimalsBeesAcaricideshoney beehygienic behaviorintegrated pest managementmarker-assisted selectionsocial immunity

Identifiers

PMID41773925
PMCPMC13365145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.