Trial reportJMIR research protocols2026
Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Oxygen-Releasing Gel With Scaling and Root Planing (SRP) With That of Scaling and Root Planing Alone in the Management of Chronic Periodontitis Patients: Study Protocol for Cross-Sectional Survey.
Trial report in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gingival recession and periodontal pockets are the results of the gradual deterioration of the alveolar bone and periodontal ligament caused by periodontitis, which is caused by inflammation of the tissues supporting the tooth. The primary goal of periodontal therapy is to eradicate these aberrant traits. Despite being a popular treatment, scaling and root planing (SRP) has limitations, such as difficulty accessing deeper pockets and root concavities. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of oxygen-releasing gel as a supplement to nonsurgical treatment for chronic periodontitis. Methods: Twenty-two systemically healthy people with sites of chronic periodontitis were the participants of a split-mouth randomized controlled experiment. For every patient, two locations were chosen and divided into two groups at random. In total, 44 sites were chosen and divided into two groups: Group I (the test group) consisted of 22 test sites, while Group II (the control group) consisted of 22 control sites. While group II underwent SRP alone, group I underwent SRP followed by the use of BlueM oral gel. Plaque index, full mouth bleeding score, clinical attachment level, and probing pocket depth were measured at baseline, one month, and three months, and were compared appropriately. Results: All the clinical measurements will be recorded. It can be anticipated that SRP followed by the use of BlueM oral gel will provide additional benefits in the management of chronic periodontitis by promoting better healing and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Within the constraints of this study, it can be anticipated that by encouraging improved healing and clinical results in chronic periodontitis, oxygen-releasing gel is more advantageous when used in conjunction with SRP than when SRP is done alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.