Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41773578›Full record

ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2026

Sector Classification of Unerupted Maxillary Canines: A Deep Learning-Based Automated Framework Using Panoramic Radiographs.

Marzio Galdi, Davide Cannatà, Flavia Celentano, Luigia Rizzo, Domenico Rossi, Tecla Bocchino, Genoveffa Tortora, Stefano Martina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marzio GaldiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
Davide CannatàDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, SA, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3578-017X
Flavia CelentanoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
Luigia RizzoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA, Italy.
Domenico RossiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6139-6920
Tecla BocchinoDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, NA, Italy.
Genoveffa TortoraDepartment of Computer Science, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA, Italy.
Stefano MartinaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, SA, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3877-1671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a deep learning-based framework to automate sector classification of unerupted maxillary canines (UMCs), assessing its accuracy and reliability compared to human ones. MATERIAL AND

methodsOne thousand five hundred twenty-eight UMCs from digital panoramic radiographs (PRs) were selected using data from the Dental Department, "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona" Hospital, Salerno. After a training session with an expert in sector classification, six dental practitioners allocated UMCs of a 20% random sample of the original set (T0) in 3 different sectors according to Kim's sector classification system. The assessment was repeated after 4 weeks (T1). The accuracy and reliability of the human in determining the position of the canines were defined based on the level of agreement between the trainer and the examiners and the intra-examiner agreement, respectively, both assessed through Cohen's K. The same radiographs were tested on different artificial intelligence (AI) models, pre-trained on the extended dataset. The best-performing model was identified based on its sensitivity and precision, and the model accuracy and repeatability were determined.

resultsRegarding UMC allocation according to different sectors, the agreement between examiners and trainer was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.77-0.80). The overall intra-examiner agreement was 0.85 (95% confidence interval = 0.83-0.87). DenseNet121 proved to be the best-performing model in allocating UMCs in the three different sectors, with an overall accuracy and repeatability of 76.8% and 95.3%, respectively.

conclusionThe developed framework provides an automated approach in sector classification of UMCs, whose accuracy is comparable to that of humans, but the reliability is greater.

Indexed as

CuspidDeep LearningRadiography, PanoramicTooth, UneruptedArtificial IntelligenceHumansMaxillaReproducibility of Resultsartificial intelligencedeep learningimpacted maxillary caninesinterceptive orthodonticsradiology

Identifiers

PMID41773578
PMCPMC13485220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.