ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2026
Sector Classification of Unerupted Maxillary Canines: A Deep Learning-Based Automated Framework Using Panoramic Radiographs.
Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a deep learning-based framework to automate sector classification of unerupted maxillary canines (UMCs), assessing its accuracy and reliability compared to human ones. MATERIAL AND
methodsOne thousand five hundred twenty-eight UMCs from digital panoramic radiographs (PRs) were selected using data from the Dental Department, "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona" Hospital, Salerno. After a training session with an expert in sector classification, six dental practitioners allocated UMCs of a 20% random sample of the original set (T0) in 3 different sectors according to Kim's sector classification system. The assessment was repeated after 4 weeks (T1). The accuracy and reliability of the human in determining the position of the canines were defined based on the level of agreement between the trainer and the examiners and the intra-examiner agreement, respectively, both assessed through Cohen's K. The same radiographs were tested on different artificial intelligence (AI) models, pre-trained on the extended dataset. The best-performing model was identified based on its sensitivity and precision, and the model accuracy and repeatability were determined.
resultsRegarding UMC allocation according to different sectors, the agreement between examiners and trainer was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.77-0.80). The overall intra-examiner agreement was 0.85 (95% confidence interval = 0.83-0.87). DenseNet121 proved to be the best-performing model in allocating UMCs in the three different sectors, with an overall accuracy and repeatability of 76.8% and 95.3%, respectively.
conclusionThe developed framework provides an automated approach in sector classification of UMCs, whose accuracy is comparable to that of humans, but the reliability is greater.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.