ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Effects of Elastic Tape Associated With Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Male Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a 2-Arm, Assessor-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may exhibit thoracoabdominal asynchrony, which reduces ventilatory efficiency. A novel intervention using elastic tape (ET) applied to the chest wall has been shown to acutely reduce thoracoabdominal asynchrony and dyspnea during exercise among individuals with COPD. We hypothesize that using ET in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) may increase the benefits of PR in this population. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the additional effects of ET on exercise capacity, symptoms of anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life, and physical activity in daily life among male individuals with moderate to very severe COPD who are undergoing PR. Methods: This is a protocol for a randomized, controlled, 2-arm, parallel, blinded assessor clinical trial. Individuals will be followed for 8 weeks, twice a week, with PR sessions lasting approximately 1 hour. Health status (COPD Assessment Test), health-related quality of life (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire), and psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) will be assessed before and after the intervention. Then, exercise capacity will be assessed via the incremental shuttle walking test and endurance shuttle walking test, and participants will use a triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph) for 7 days to assess physical activity in daily life. Subsequently, individuals will be randomized into ET or sham groups; both groups will complete a PR program (2 times per week for 8 weeks). The ET group will receive applications of ET, whereas the sham group will receive a nonelastic tape. Data will be presented as means and SDs or medians and IQRs. Intergroup comparisons will be performed using a 2-way ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni post hoc correction test, or the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn post hoc test. The threshold for statistical significance will be set at 5%. Results: The clinical trial registration was approved in June 2023. Recruitment and data collection for the trial are ongoing; as of November 2025, a total of 10 individuals have been recruited, and the results are expected to be available by the end of November 2026. Conclusions: We hypothesize that the use of ET can enhance the benefits of PR in individuals with moderate to very severe COPD and increase exercise capacity and quality of life, as well as reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.