ArticleJournal of phycology2026
Contrasting patterns of population structure in two habitat-forming kelp species in southeastern Australia.
Article in Journal of phycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contrasting patterns of population structure in two habitat-forming kelp species in southeastern Australia.Journal of phycology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The distribution and connectivity of species around the globe are changing at a rapid pace. Increasing sea temperatures are a driving factor of changes in temperate macroalgal distributions. Southeast Australia is considered a global ocean-warming hotspot, where macroalgal populations are predicted to decline significantly by 2100. We used genotyping by sequencing and Lagrangian particle modeling to compare the genetic population structure and connectivity of two habitat-forming macroalgae, Macrocystis pyrifera and Durvillaea potatorum, in southeastern Australia. Both species showed regional population structures, although this was greatest in D. potatorum, as which populations showed greater dissimilarity than in M. pyrifera. Particle modeling suggested that self-recruitment and connectivity among populations were highest in northeast Tasmania for both species, with particles often stranding along the nearby coast. Intriguingly, the southernmost M. pyrifera population in Tasmania shared more recent ancestry with a mainland Australia population. Although uncommon, simulations indicated that it is possible for rafts of M. pyrifera from mainland Australia to reach far-southern Tasmania. Hindcast simulations indicated those rafts are likely to come from mainland Australia via the Zeehan Current and along the western Tasmanian coast; unsampled western Tasmanian populations might therefore also share close ancestry with western mainland populations. With genetically distinct populations and low connectivity among areas, southeastern Australian kelp populations are vulnerable to losses of genetic diversity. This study provides insights into contemporary population structure and connectivity processes in two kelp species that form important habitats for biodiversity and fisheries on the Great Southern Reef and which are both undergoing range contractions with rapid environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.