Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41773508›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2026

Contrasting patterns of population structure in two habitat-forming kelp species in southeastern Australia.

Finn J Ryder, William S Pearman, Cayne Layton, Elahe Parvizi, Craig Johnson, Alecia Bellgrove, Ceridwen I Fraser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Finn J RyderDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6512-0175
William S PearmanDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7265-8499
Cayne LaytonInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3390-6437
Elahe ParviziTe Aka Mātuatua/School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1695-8817
Craig JohnsonInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Alecia BellgroveSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin Marine Research and Innovation Centre, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0499-3439
Ceridwen I FraserDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

Marsden Fund MFP-20-UOO-173Royal Society Te Apārangi RDF-UOO1803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution and connectivity of species around the globe are changing at a rapid pace. Increasing sea temperatures are a driving factor of changes in temperate macroalgal distributions. Southeast Australia is considered a global ocean-warming hotspot, where macroalgal populations are predicted to decline significantly by 2100. We used genotyping by sequencing and Lagrangian particle modeling to compare the genetic population structure and connectivity of two habitat-forming macroalgae, Macrocystis pyrifera and Durvillaea potatorum, in southeastern Australia. Both species showed regional population structures, although this was greatest in D. potatorum, as which populations showed greater dissimilarity than in M. pyrifera. Particle modeling suggested that self-recruitment and connectivity among populations were highest in northeast Tasmania for both species, with particles often stranding along the nearby coast. Intriguingly, the southernmost M. pyrifera population in Tasmania shared more recent ancestry with a mainland Australia population. Although uncommon, simulations indicated that it is possible for rafts of M. pyrifera from mainland Australia to reach far-southern Tasmania. Hindcast simulations indicated those rafts are likely to come from mainland Australia via the Zeehan Current and along the western Tasmanian coast; unsampled western Tasmanian populations might therefore also share close ancestry with western mainland populations. With genetically distinct populations and low connectivity among areas, southeastern Australian kelp populations are vulnerable to losses of genetic diversity. This study provides insights into contemporary population structure and connectivity processes in two kelp species that form important habitats for biodiversity and fisheries on the Great Southern Reef and which are both undergoing range contractions with rapid environmental change.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenetic VariationKelpMacrocystisAustraliaGenotypeTasmaniaconnectivitydispersalgenetic diversitygenetic isolationkelpparticle modeling

Identifiers

PMID41773508
PMCPMC13103697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.