ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Freshwater Conservation Priority Areas Are Threatened by Global Mining Activities.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revealing Hidden Biodiversity Footprints Embedded in Global Mining Supply Chains.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mining poses significant and persistent threats to freshwater ecosystems, with impacts often enduring long after operations cease. Growing concerns suggest that the expansion of mining to meet global mineral demands for decarbonization may amplify these cumulative risks to freshwater biodiversity. However, the location and extent of potential conflict hotspots remain poorly understood, hampering our ability to meet international conservation targets. Here, we map areas of potential conflict between freshwater conservation priority areas and global mining activities. Using a spatial modeling approach, we trace potential downstream contamination and quantify the extent of affected river reaches within conservation priority areas. Our analysis reveals that mining may pollute up to 1.8 million km of downstream rivers (5% of the global total), over 18% of which lies within conservation priority areas. Gold mining is associated with the largest extent of potentially contaminated rivers, and its widespread reliance on unregulated small-scale artisanal practices can lead to disproportionately severe impacts on freshwater biodiversity in affected areas. Furthermore, rivers potentially affected by coal mining far exceed those linked to the share of key energy transition minerals needed for clean energy technologies (cobalt, copper, graphite, lithium, nickel, and rare earth elements). Effectively safeguarding and restoring freshwater ecosystems will require conservation and regulatory frameworks that address downstream mining impacts, especially in the context of future mineral expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.