ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Assessing Disruption Impact on Quality Improvement Activities Designed to Improve HPV Vaccination in Rural Primary Care.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrimary care clinics often undertake quality improvement (QI) projects to enhance care delivery. Disruptions to clinical practice, such as staffing changes, can hinder QI efforts. Limited research examines how primary care clinics experience and respond to disruptions. This study explores the types and impacts of disruptions and factors linked to resilience for rural clinics during a Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination QI study.
methodsWe used a mixed-methods, longitudinal design to assess disruption frequency and type alongside clinic-level vaccination outcomes. Qualitative case studies explored how disruptions influenced QI participation and resilience factors.
resultsAmong 41 rural clinics studied, all reported at least 1 disruption during QI implementation, including staffing loss (37 clinics, 90%), EHR implementation (10 clinics, 24%), and organizational changes (4 clinics, 9%). Disruption frequency and type did not differ across quartiles of HPV vaccination improvement. Eight clinics were selected for in-depth case study analysis, which revealed factors shaping resilience: (1) clinic characteristics, (2) practice facilitator support, and (3) disruption characteristics.
conclusionDisruption type or number did not explain differences in vaccination improvement. Multiple factors were found to influence resilience and continued QI. Identifying and enhancing these facilitators is critical to supporting primary care clinics through inevitable challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.