ReviewCurrent addiction reports2026
Affective Factors in the Co-Occurrence of Personality Disorders and Substance Use Disorders.
Review in Current addiction reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Personality disorders (PDs) and substance use disorders (SUDs) co-occur at high rates. Transdiagnostic mechanisms such as affective processes could improve our understanding of etiology, maintenance, and treatment of co-occurring disorders. We review the role that affective factors play in the overlap between PDs and SUDs and focus on current directions in assessment and evaluation of affective processes. Recent Findings: Recent affect-related work informing PD and SUD co-occurrence has focused on conceptualizing PDs dimensionally, testing affective processes as transdiagnostic constructs, issues in affect measurement, using ecological momentary assessment to identify proximal risk pathways, and debate on the role of affect in SUD. Summary: Affective changes can be reliably measured in daily life, and evidence supports using dimensional models of PDs compared to categorical diagnoses. Future work should build on these strengths and focus on careful translations of SUD theories to research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.