Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41773269›Full record

ReviewJournal of blood medicine2026

Current Status of Clinical Gene Therapy for Hemophilia and Globin Disorders.

Rebecca Winkler, Ishan Herath, Radoslaw Kaczmarek, Weidong Xiao, Roland W Herzog, Paige E Severeid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of blood medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca WinklerHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research and Department Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ishan HerathHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research and Department Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-9904-9184
Radoslaw KaczmarekHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research and Department Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Weidong XiaoHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research and Department Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Roland W HerzogHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research and Department Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Paige E SevereidHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research and Department Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Toward Safer Gene Therapy for Hemophilia AP01HL160472 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Roland W. Herzog · 2022 to 2026
$15.1M
BASIC SCIENCE STUDIES ON GENE THERAPY OF BLOOD DISEASEST32HL007910 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Roland W. Herzog, Reuben Kapur · 1999 to 2026
$7.6M
Enhancing immune regulation in gene therapy for hemophiliaR01HL131093 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Ype Peter De Jong, Roland W. Herzog · 2016 to 2026
$7.2M
Capsid- and genome-modified AAV3 vectors for hemophilia gene therapy.R01HL177230 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Roland W. Herzog, Arun Srivastava · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL160472NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131093NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL177230NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few years, gene therapy, holding the promise for long-term disease correction through a one-time treatment, has transitioned from experimental research to approved medicine. Several gene therapies are now available for congenital blood disorders, notably for hemophilia and hemoglobinopathies. In this review, we discuss each of the six therapies that now have regulatory approval for treatment in the United States: Roctavian (valoctocogene roxaparvovec) for hemophilia A, Beqvez (fidanacogene elaparvovec) and Hemgenix (etranacogene dezaparvovec) for hemophilia B, Lyfgenia (lovotibeglogene autotemcel) for sickle cell disease, Zynteglo (betibeglogene autotemcel) for β-thalassemia, and Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel) for either sickle cell disease or β-thalassemia. The underlying principles for these treatments vary and include both in vivo and ex vivo methods, lentiviral and adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors, and gene silencing by the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system. Consequently, they pose correspondingly disparate risks and benefits when compared to other treatment modalities and to each other. Although long-term effects are not yet entirely understood, given the novelty of these therapies, knowledge on patient outcomes is continuously increasing. Overall, results are very encouraging, often freeing patients from the need for coagulation factor or red blood cell (RBC) infusions, albeit that for some of these diseases there is room for further improvement in terms of safety and therapeutic durability, which may be achieved with next-generation gene therapy products. However, improvements are needed to address issues with durability of results, side effects, and accessibility of these therapies.

Indexed as

AAVCRISPRHSClentiviralsicklethalassemia

Identifiers

PMID41773269
PMCPMC12949972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.