ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Predictors of 90-Days Readmission and Emergency Visits Following Catheter Ablation for Arrhythmias: A Retrospective Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although catheter ablation is a cornerstone in arrhythmia management, hospital readmissions, emergency room (ER) visits, and complications remain a significant clinical burden. Defining their frequency and predictors is essential to optimize patient follow-up and outcomes after ablation. Methods: To evaluate the rates and predictors of 90-day hospital readmissions and emergency room visits following catheter ablation, as well as procedure-related complications, among patients undergoing catheter ablation, a retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), including adult patients undergoing catheter ablation between June 2022 and June 2024. Data were extracted from BestCare electronic medical records and analyzed using Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression. Results: Among 176 patients, 13 (7.4%) were readmitted and 23 (13.1%) visited the ER, predominantly due to arrhythmia recurrence (61.5% and 60.9%, respectively). Recurrent events occurred in a subset of patients and were significantly more frequent among older individuals and those with a higher comorbidity burden (p<0.01). Conclusion: Ninety-day readmissions and ER visits after catheter ablation were infrequent, mostly due to arrhythmia recurrence. Independent predictors included older age and comorbidity burden, underscoring the need for risk stratification and structured follow-up strategies to reduce preventable healthcare utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.