ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
Identifying hub functions and collaboration patterns in hikikomori support networks: A nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Hikikomori, a condition involving prolonged social withdrawal, has become a major public health and social challenge in Japan and many countries. While support institutions are essential for reaching this population, little is known about how their organizational characteristics influence collaboration with other services. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 1024 hikikomori-related support institutions in Japan between February and March 2021. Institutions were classified using K-means cluster analysis based on staff size, collaboration count, and case volume. Multiple regression models assessed associations between these attributes and levels of external collaboration with health and welfare organizations. Results: Three distinct institutional clusters were identified. Institutions serving more diverse populations showed higher levels of interorganizational collaboration; a lean, outreach-oriented "Collaborative Core" subgroup exhibited the strongest external engagement. Conclusion: Structural features such as diversity, functional capacity, and outreach orientation were associated with network collaboration. Policymakers and administrators should consider these structural attributes when designing inclusive and coordinated public mental health services for socially withdrawn populations. The proposed framework may serve as a model for similar contexts across countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.