ArticleHealth science reports2026
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Assessment of the CULIG's Questionnaire to Measure the Extent and Reasons for Medication Nonadherence in Iranian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes During (2017-2018): A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: This study aimed to test adaptability of the CULIG's questionnaire (CULIG-P) for assessment of medication regimen adherence among the Persian speaking patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A standard forward and backward translation procedure was utilized to adapt first draft of the CULIG-P which was sent in the next stage to 15 experts for content and face validities' appraisal. The approved final draft of the CULIG-P was completed by the 304 recruited patients with type 2 diabetes. Cronbach's alpha and Kappa with Linear weighting were also estimated to check internal consistency and reliability of the scale. The structural validity of the CULIG-P was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Results: The values of Cronbach's alpha (0.77) and weighted kappa coefficient for most of the scale's items were in acceptable range. Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were also indicated reasonable construct of the CULIG-P for assessment of the reasons of medication regimen nonadherence among the study participants. The implemented factor analysis with varimax rotation extracted five factors which explained 41.81% of the data's total variance. Conclusions: The findings revealed usability of the CULIG-P in studies and probably practice settings for assessment of medication regimen adherence/nonadherence in Persian-speaking type 2 diabetes patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.