ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
An ISO 31000-Based Risk Matrix for Risk Management in Anticancer Drug Prescription, Compounding, and Administration for Lung Cancer Patients Treated in a Day Hospital Setting.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to identify and reduce risks that could negatively impact patient safety and organizational aspects related to the different phases of anticancer drug therapy for lung cancer patients in the Day Hospital (DH) care. Methods: From April 2023 until February 2024, a team of multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals of the National Cancer Institute of Naples, Italy, used a modified Delphi approach to identify the care process, the main activities and related risk factors. The severity of these harms and the probability of their occurrence were assessed by applying a 5×5 semi-quantitative ISO 31000:2018 (ISO 31000) risk matrix. Multiple improvement actions were identified and adopted by the team to reduce the risks to acceptable levels. Results: Nine main activities, 19 correlated potential risks (10 risks for patient safety domain; 53.0%) (9 risks for organizational area; 47.0%) and 19 mitigation measures were identified. The highest risk levels were recognized in the organizational area for: (i) DH Outpatient Visits, due to delays in patients check-in or lab test results or problems with the prescription software; (ii) anticancer drugs administration, for the unavailability of chemotherapy chairs or lack of dedicated nursing staff. Conversely, risk levels for patient safety area were low overall, because several control measures were already in place. Once the mitigation measures were implemented, a new semi-quantitative risk analysis was performed. Risk levels for organizational area changed from a 44.4% to 0.0% in high level, from 44.4% to 67.0% in moderate level, and from 11.2% to 33.0% in minor level. Risk levels for safety areas did not modify for high level (10.0%), but changed from 50.0% to 10.0% in moderate level and increased from 40.0% to 80.0% in minor level. Conclusion: ISO 31000 risk management framework applied to lung cancer DH care could improve both organizational and safety objectives in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.