ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Clinicopathological Analysis of 40 Cases of Extramammary Paget Disease: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extramammary Paget Disease (EMPD) is a rare intra-epithelial malignancy often misdiagnosed due to diverse clinical manifestations. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features of 40 EMPD patients to provide references for clinical practice. Methods: Clinical data of 40 patients with pathologically confirmed EMPD were collected, including demographics, clinical features, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings, treatments, and follow-up outcomes. Results: Of the 40 patients (27 males, 13 females; mean age 68.8 years), the most common onset location was the external genitalia (n = 33). Lesions primarily presented as erythema or red plaques (n = 38), with itching being the most common symptom (n = 26). Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for CK7, CEA, and EMA, with positive rates of 70% for GCDFP-15 and 25% for CK20. Thirty-nine patients underwent surgical excision, and one received photodynamic therapy combined with radiotherapy. During follow-up after surgery, one patient with invasive features (tumor mass in the dermis) recurred but achieved remission after reoperation; the other 38 patients remained disease-free. Invasive EMPD was associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Conclusion: EMPD's varied presentations pose diagnostic challenges. Key diagnostic differentials include eczema, psoriasis, and melanoma, particularly for rare pigmented or depigmented variants. For clinicians, a high index of suspicion and prompt biopsy are crucial for early diagnosis. For pathologists, a comprehensive immunohistochemical panel is essential, while CK20's utility in distinguishing primary from secondary disease is limited and warrants further malignancy screening. Surgical excision remains the primary treatment, with alternative therapies effective for inoperable cases. Early diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and long-term follow-up are crucial for optimal prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.